Japanese cabinet lifts limits on self-defense(2)

The main opposition party, the Democratic Party of Japan, denounced the reinterpretation as a "backroom deal that will not be recognized". The Japanese Communist Party said the reinterpretation violated the Constitution.

Yang Bojiang, a senior expert on Japan studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said the new interpretation marks "a turning point in Japan's postwar security policy history", and it "does not bode well".

"Reactivating Japan's collective self-defense abilities will worsen complexities in the region and add more uncertainty to the region's future. ... It will prompt Japan's Asian neighbors to adjust their policies," he said.

Kazutoshi Hando, a prominent Japanese expert on the Showa Era (1926-89), warned in an interview with Japan's Jiji Press that the reinterpretation will "completely nullify Article 9 of the Constitution".

He forecast that Abe would seek to introduce a law to transform Japan's self-defense forces into a national military force. "That would be the point of no return. Japan would become a 'normal' country that is prepared for war," Hando said.

Shigeki Okuno, a 30-year-old social sciences major at Waseda University, said: "I oppose the collective self-defense because it will pave the way to war. Abe wants to restore Japan's militarism.

"We don't like the tension in the East China Sea, and we'll continue to protest. Today is not the end but the beginning," the student said.

At a discussion organized by Japan's Social Democratic Party, Toru Hayano, a professor at Oberlin University in Tokyo, said: "The Abe Cabinet will send young people to overseas battlefields."

Feng Wei, a Japan studies professor at Fudan University in Shanghai, said Tokyo is breaking away from the tradition of not launching a preemptive attack.